E-mail is dead. Long live email.
The Associated Press officially kills off ‘e-mail’ in favour of ‘email’ in their official style guide.
Though it may not always be apparent from my occasionally incoherent ravings on this blog, I am an English major.
And like many English majors, I tend to be a bit of (a) stickler when it comes to the evolution of our language. I wrinkle my nose at terms like “mixtape”, “staycation” and “frenemy.” I resent it when people use words that have had long-held meanings in a new context e.g. “voluptuous” now means “overweight” in certain circles.
And for a very long time I insisted that it was “e-mail”, not “email.” We even debated the word here in the office with most of the twenty-somethings doing a very poor job of hiding their amusement that us we old-timers could cling so firmly to our precious hyphen.
For years however, I had the power of the press behind me. Every traditional publication at least, was consistently using “e-mail” so I certainly wasn’t going to abandon it.
Today however, the hook that I had been hanging my e-mail hat on, was unexpectedly taken away in the form – of all things – a tweet.
Not just any tweet. An official tweet from the folks who run the AP Style Book twitter account, in which they said:
There we have it. Not that the Associated Press is necessarily the last word on spelling, but if they have now moved to a world of hyphen-less emails, it’s only a matter of time before it makes its way into more official records such as the Oxford English Dictionary.
So long e-mail. We had a good ride, but I think our time to part ways has come. I’ll miss you old friend. I’ll always remember with great fondness the time you entered my life and all of the promise and excitement that you brought with you. I will especially miss your hyphen. It suited you.
I am not a fan of abbreviations for the sake of abbreviating. (I.E. BTW)But this one makes sense. When was the last time you said “telecopier” instead of “fax”?
I do believe that fax is short for facsimile…not telecopier.
You’re correct. The telecopier, if I remember was actually replaced by the fax in my office (waaay back when I first started working).
What is a ‘telecopier’? I am 69 and when I was 17 I had a summer job with NB Tel&Tel (that’s what it was called waaaaay back then) as a typist on a teletype, and believe me, one HAD to be a good speller as well as an excellent typist, as what you typed went onto a stockticker-type tape and you could not read what you typed, so you just prayed that what you typed was correct, and once the typing was completed, you pressed the ‘send’ button and prayed again! My goodness, how times have changed!!!
Actually tho we do not say it that way, properly a telecopier was replaced by a faxmachine. A fax is the paper that come out of the machine.
Although “Faxmachine” would legitimize the abbreviation “Fax”, there is no such word. It is, as stated above, a “facsimile” machine. Fax is the inevitable short form of a word that we of the techno-generation (oops, hyphen) are apt to do because big words are hard to remember and are even harder to text……geez.
Ah, now we can porounce it “em-ail”………
Rats!! “pronounce”
How do you pronounce the word HISTORIC?
just say it…HIS-TOR-IC…(but don’t pronounce the HYPHENS…ha
Wow! Can’t wait till Internet becomes internet. Of course if we wait long enough, it’ll just be Net. Or Web. Or maybe Wb (I hate twitter. Or is it Twitter?).
What took them so long. I’ve been leaving the hyphen out for as long as I can remember.
Does it not stand for ‘electronic’ mail?
Was always confused about with or without the hyphen. Now I can relax and save some ink…
What English major writes “I tend to be a bit of stickler”?
The kind that tends to be a bit of a stickler. I thought that was obvious :)
I think the comment was about, “a bit of stickler” which is obviously an editing error. We know you meant, “a bit of A stickler”…
Wow. You know I must have looked at David’s comment 5 times before replying and I *still* didn’t see the mistake. Looks like I need glasses. Or an editor. Or both. :)
Sorry David, and thanks Edith.
I was surprised to note that an English major would use an accusative where clearly the nominative is correct. I quote ” that US old timers would cling etc. I’m sure that on reflection you will agree that US is the subject of the verb CLING, and therefore the pronoun WE should have been used. I don’t think US can be accepted as a colloquialism, do you?
Hmm I see your point. You are of course absolutely right. I suppose I’ve heard, or at least I think I’ve heard it used this way so often it now feels okay to me. But no excuses here… fixed! (with thanks!)
You know, I had a bad feeling that starting this post by declaring my university degree, it would put the rest of the text under a microscope ;-) But I’m glad I did. My English is far from perfect and I always welcome corrections from readers.
It is so easy to use grammar in a way in which we have heard it used many times. So many people are not critical of how they use the English language and it sometimes is like nails on a chalkboard listening to people speak. It appears that grammar is not a priority in school anymore and with texting, etc. it has definitely gone by the wayside. It’s a shame.
Indeed it does. Now without the hyphen can we pronounce it “em-ail”?
What?
It is not so much the evolution of nouns that annoys me as the loss of basic grammar skills among the younger set that has begun to make modern speech and writing SO grating to the eyes and ears. If I hear one more company proclaim something like “our product has less calories!” (rather than FEWER calories, which would be actual English) I swear I’m going to scream. The loss of adverbs (e.g. “she’s running real fast” rather than “running really quickly”) is also maddening, and is dragging us closer and closer to a kind of coarse, American English that dumbs us down and impoverishes the English language.
Don’t you love those commercials that proclaim “three times less costly”, or some similar claim; instead of one-third the cost.
YES! YES! YES! Spelling, grammar, and lame descriptive words and
adjectives, which spell “BORING!” Equally disturbing is,
what happened to the teachings of Phonics, whereby a difficult
looking word can be “sounded out”, thereby enabling the reader to
properly read and pronounce new words?
FINALLY!!!! Someone who noticed the same thing that I have been noticing the past few months, which is – the proper context in which ‘few’ or ‘fewer’ is used vs ‘less’ or ‘lesser’. I do not have a university degree but English grammar was one of my best subjects all through my school years, especially during high school. It irks me no end when I see that advertisement mentioned on tv but … I have also seen much the same thing in newspaper articles which were written by supposed ‘experts’ who get paid big bucks to write columns for dailies. Once can say ‘fewer’ in some instances or ‘lesser’ (as in the lesser of two evils).
I often wonder not simply WHAT they are teaching students today but HOW they are teaching, especially English grammar.
I am 69 yrs old and when I see public ads that incorrectly use the words ‘few(er)’ and ‘less(er)’ I shake my head and wonder what type of phrase wrongly misused I will see next. Texting has made the students of today somewhat lazy so it’s no wonder half cannot spell even the simplest word. We may be in a new era what with all the electronic gadgets available today for texting, emailing, etc (hey, I own a pc), it has only made people lazier. FIRST you learn how to spell words correctly, THEN you can abbreviate for texting. But dollars to donuts those who constantly text are very poor spellers!
My 2 cents worth!
I agree! “It’s some irritating!” It’s out of control and unless grammar becomes a subject again in the classroom as it was when I went to school, it will only get worse.
I am tired of the English language being destroyed little by little by people who are too lazy to use it properly. Every day I see the words “to” and “too” being mis-used. There, they’re and their. Where, wear, ware and were and we’re are other examples of people either not knowing the differences of these words or not caring.
An “e-mail” is akin to a written letter and abbreviations such as “btw” “ffs” and “lol” don’t belong.
As an ESL teacher(conversation, not spelling) I’ve learned tht english is one of the most complex languages to learn and teach. the only constent I’ve found is that 1 IS and 2 ARE. i before e except after c and sometimes after y are not. 2 short vowels dont always make a long one. add confusion to it and put 3 vowels together. english has something like 50,000 words, chinese 10,000+/-, other languages i would think tend to be this way also. I do think that if one is sending an email that using long hand is more apropriet(sp), but for texting it’s almost a must to make it short hand. that being said, I do think tht most english speaking people sound like 6 yr olds in how bad their grammer is.
“I do think tht most english speaking people sound like 6 yr olds in how bad their grammer is”…
Good Lord, are you kidding me? And you’re an ESL teacher?!! No wonder our newcomers speak as poorly as they do! “People” is in the plural, the name of a language should be capitalized, “bad” is an adjective not an adverb, numerical digits should never be used in written sentences, &c.
How about the proper form, as follows: “I do think that most English-speaking people sound like six year-olds insofar as their knowledge and use of English grammar”.
There’s goes the english language!!! Pretty sad when people have to use shortened words to text or email. Things like BRB or LMAO etc make me think that people are getting lazier. Also when I read crap like that it also makes me think that people just can’t spell. In the end it looks like the general public will end up being stupid and lazy.
There is goes the english language…
Way to be a great example for your own point. ;)
This E-mail losing the hyphen is like a Fe-male losing the hymen
My Fe-male lost her hymen, well for hyphen-sake!
I join those who are mourning the slow death of proper English. At the rate we’re going, our conversations are going to sound like the kind of gibberish you might hear from a room full of chimpanzees hopped-up on high powered speed.
Trolls do not recognize the Caps Lock key.
I trulyregret the demise of the English language and one word Irefuse to use is “texting”, instead I always say or write “sending a text message.
What’s the big deal? Computers have been around long before Benjamin Franklin invented electricity, or was that discovered? IDK.
Please tell me that you’re being intentionally dense. That kind of stupidity is exactly the kind of phenomenon that is killing our language.
It stands to reason that, since society is devolving in it’s ethics and intelligence, language will also devolve with it. I’m betting that we will end up with a written language similar to ancient times where simple pictures will replace words entirely. And I’m pretty sure we will also end up grunting at each other rather than use eloquent speech to express our ideas and opinions.
Can you say CAVEMAN?
The art of talking is also long gone >I was sitting in a coffee bar listening to 3 young ladies talking every thing is ,OH My God,And they talked so fast and spelled out some words in short form ,I just grinned and said Wow the English language is GONE
Your post illustrates that well enough. Well done.
LONG LIVE E(HYPHEN)MAIL!!!
I stand and clap and say “BRAVO!”
What irritates me most of all is someone(s) thinking they can decide these things for everyone else. Who decides who gets to decide?? I’ll write it as I choose, thank you very much.
Nope. If you write it as you choose, & I write it as I choose, and everybody writes it as they choose, no one will understand anyone else. The purpose of language, written or spoken, is communication. When you’ve lost that, you’ve lost the purpose.
you are an IGNORANT thing
As long as we communicate that’s all that seems to matter.
Mediocrity is the name of the game and, sadly,
grammar and diction are a thing of the past.
Language has been evolving since it’s first usage. Socrates was disdainful of written language. He believed that words outside of their original context (ie the intention of the person using them, and the way a listener might hear them) can mean anything, and thus nothing at all. Users of the English language are going to freak out every time someone tries to change it to suit themselves and their needs. Nothing new here. Nothing has changed in the bigger picture: some people will strive to use proper English and others will use their own version.