<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujifilm revives the instant camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE INSTANT CAMERA &#124; Find Product</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html/comment-page-1#comment-53921</link>
		<dc:creator>THE INSTANT CAMERA &#124; Find Product</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=10705#comment-53921</guid>
		<description>[...] Photos: the instant camera sync-blog.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photos: the instant camera sync-blog.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html/comment-page-1#comment-34893</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=10705#comment-34893</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, and in fact Polaroid did just that with their &quot;PoGo&quot; product - a digital cameras with a Zink-based printer built-in. However the print quality IMHO is not as good as the Fujifilm/Polaroid instant cams.
see more here: http://www.polaroid.com/category/0/266907/Polaroid_PoGo%26%238482%3B
unfortunately I don&#039;t think Polaroid ever distrributed the PoGo here in Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, and in fact Polaroid did just that with their &#8220;PoGo&#8221; product &#8211; a digital cameras with a Zink-based printer built-in. However the print quality IMHO is not as good as the Fujifilm/Polaroid instant cams.<br />
see more here: <a href="http://www.polaroid.com/category/0/266907/Polaroid_PoGo%26%238482%3B" rel="nofollow">http://www.polaroid.com/category/0/266907/Polaroid_PoGo%26%238482%3B</a><br />
unfortunately I don&#8217;t think Polaroid ever distrributed the PoGo here in Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JediMaster</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html/comment-page-1#comment-34835</link>
		<dc:creator>JediMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=10705#comment-34835</guid>
		<description>kind of feels like a step backwards...maybe it&#039;s time to make a digital camera with a mini inkjet printer inside so you can print multiple copies of a single photo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kind of feels like a step backwards&#8230;maybe it&#8217;s time to make a digital camera with a mini inkjet printer inside so you can print multiple copies of a single photo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xavi</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html/comment-page-1#comment-34810</link>
		<dc:creator>xavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=10705#comment-34810</guid>
		<description>Are these newer than the Instax Mini 25&#039;s? I heard they just came out in the US :) Anyway, I hope I can buy one of these in my country :( The shipping costs are kind of expensive @__@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these newer than the Instax Mini 25&#8242;s? I heard they just came out in the US :) Anyway, I hope I can buy one of these in my country :( The shipping costs are kind of expensive @__@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html/comment-page-1#comment-34808</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=10705#comment-34808</guid>
		<description>Very good article.I think we used to shake them thinking they would dry faster.Photos have become very impersonal.We share them with everyone on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article.I think we used to shake them thinking they would dry faster.Photos have become very impersonal.We share them with everyone on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Fujifilm revives the instant camera -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/07/fujifilm-revives-the-instant-camera.html/comment-page-1#comment-34770</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Fujifilm revives the instant camera -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=10705#comment-34770</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by spritetrails, syncblog. syncblog said: Fujifilm revives the instant camera http://bit.ly/d1WRqC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by spritetrails, syncblog. syncblog said: Fujifilm revives the instant camera <a href="http://bit.ly/d1WRqC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/d1WRqC</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

