<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: A look at Sony&#8217;s first 3DTV at CES 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-48214</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=6270#comment-48214</guid>
		<description>Sonys Bravia Review
Reviews about the Sony KDL40HX800 3D TV are all raving about this TV. It seems that this is Sony’s year, seeing as the models that they have been putting out have been greeted with praise. The only downside that can be seen right now is that a television set that is 3D-capable is understandably pricier than a normal High-definition TV.

This set was first sold for $2,099, but the prices have now been lowered down to $1,698.  Although this is still more than what you would pay for a non-3D television, this is still considered as the best price-to-quality ratio when it comes to all the 3D TVs that are now out in the market.

Upon review of this product, more and more people are becoming convinced that it is the best product in the market right now. After receiving a whopping 4.5 stars out of five, that’s a percentage of up to 96% customer satisfaction, it seems that the facts are proving them right. No other producth as ever been met with such satisfaction and customer approval.

Because of this new widespread release of HDTV viewing in 3D, it is a must that you also have the right equipment to be able to enjoy this technology. Make sure that you also have the proper 3D glasses.

Buying 3D glasses straight from Sony will assure you that you have the highest quality glasses; hence, also the highest-quality 3D viewing. The Sony KDL40HX800 3D TV is simply not complete without the proper 3D glasses.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://3dtv-1080p.com/sony-kdl40hx800-40-inch-1080p-240hz-3d-ready-led-backlit-lcd-hdtv/&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sony 3D TV Review&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonys Bravia Review<br />
Reviews about the Sony KDL40HX800 3D TV are all raving about this TV. It seems that this is Sony’s year, seeing as the models that they have been putting out have been greeted with praise. The only downside that can be seen right now is that a television set that is 3D-capable is understandably pricier than a normal High-definition TV.</p>
<p>This set was first sold for $2,099, but the prices have now been lowered down to $1,698.  Although this is still more than what you would pay for a non-3D television, this is still considered as the best price-to-quality ratio when it comes to all the 3D TVs that are now out in the market.</p>
<p>Upon review of this product, more and more people are becoming convinced that it is the best product in the market right now. After receiving a whopping 4.5 stars out of five, that’s a percentage of up to 96% customer satisfaction, it seems that the facts are proving them right. No other producth as ever been met with such satisfaction and customer approval.</p>
<p>Because of this new widespread release of HDTV viewing in 3D, it is a must that you also have the right equipment to be able to enjoy this technology. Make sure that you also have the proper 3D glasses.</p>
<p>Buying 3D glasses straight from Sony will assure you that you have the highest quality glasses; hence, also the highest-quality 3D viewing. The Sony KDL40HX800 3D TV is simply not complete without the proper 3D glasses.<br />
<a href="http://3dtv-1080p.com/sony-kdl40hx800-40-inch-1080p-240hz-3d-ready-led-backlit-lcd-hdtv/" / rel="nofollow">Sony 3D TV Review</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Saltzman</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-28026</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Saltzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=6270#comment-28026</guid>
		<description>Hi ex-sell69,

That&#039;s because you need a HDMI 1.4 cable (high-speed) for 3DTV -- not v.1.3 or older as they won&#039;t work. Prices for an HDMI v.1.4 cable are about $70.

Cheers,

Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ex-sell69,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because you need a HDMI 1.4 cable (high-speed) for 3DTV &#8212; not v.1.3 or older as they won&#8217;t work. Prices for an HDMI v.1.4 cable are about $70.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-sell69</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-28023</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-sell69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=6270#comment-28023</guid>
		<description>Hey Marc, 3DTV sounds great and all, but why are you telling people that a HDMI cable should cost about $70 to $350? If you pay more than $15 for a HDMI cable you&#039;re a sucker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Marc, 3DTV sounds great and all, but why are you telling people that a HDMI cable should cost about $70 to $350? If you pay more than $15 for a HDMI cable you&#8217;re a sucker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: din365</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-26002</link>
		<dc:creator>din365</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=6270#comment-26002</guid>
		<description>Great! now regular HDTV&#039;s can now go down in prices that people can actually afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! now regular HDTV&#8217;s can now go down in prices that people can actually afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-25958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=6270#comment-25958</guid>
		<description>Hate to break it to you, but Sony and Samsung co-devoloped their LCD screen technologies together. the same screen technologies they keep the same resolutions at each size, unless you are comparing them to Samsungs plasma, then whats the point of that. Wtf is &quot;official HDTV limits&quot;? If you are on 1 cable company, they have a set HD level as per the hd hardware, and another cable company can be totally differant, not to mention SAT. companies plethora of hardware, which has no standard from receiver to receiver. My point is, why bash Sony over their  HD LCD scrrens in an article showcasing a newer technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to break it to you, but Sony and Samsung co-devoloped their LCD screen technologies together. the same screen technologies they keep the same resolutions at each size, unless you are comparing them to Samsungs plasma, then whats the point of that. Wtf is &#8220;official HDTV limits&#8221;? If you are on 1 cable company, they have a set HD level as per the hd hardware, and another cable company can be totally differant, not to mention SAT. companies plethora of hardware, which has no standard from receiver to receiver. My point is, why bash Sony over their  HD LCD scrrens in an article showcasing a newer technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wino</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-25758</link>
		<dc:creator>Wino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=6270#comment-25758</guid>
		<description>Get any any tv other than BRAVIA for a lot less and a lot lot better if 3d equivalents come out. Sony was desperate for and update to the trinitron televisions of the past that surpasses equivalents in the display world for now. Unless the tv&#039;s are at max sizes and not close to 25 inch or less, then the resolutions are not even close to what SAMSUNG and LG as examples can do at 22 inch plus and at 30 35 inches expect even the sony will comply with official HDTV limits in north american and other locations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get any any tv other than BRAVIA for a lot less and a lot lot better if 3d equivalents come out. Sony was desperate for and update to the trinitron televisions of the past that surpasses equivalents in the display world for now. Unless the tv&#8217;s are at max sizes and not close to 25 inch or less, then the resolutions are not even close to what SAMSUNG and LG as examples can do at 22 inch plus and at 30 35 inches expect even the sony will comply with official HDTV limits in north american and other locations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/01/video-a-look-at-sonys-first-3dtv-at-ces-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-25655</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sync-blog.com/?p=6270#comment-25655</guid>
		<description>Thats really cool! I think that you&#039;d need more glasses though, I guess you&#039;ll just have to buy them separately. According to http://www.3dtvinformation.com/ though, they are coming out with tvs that don&#039;t need glasses but are still 3d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats really cool! I think that you&#8217;d need more glasses though, I guess you&#8217;ll just have to buy them separately. According to <a href="http://www.3dtvinformation.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.3dtvinformation.com/</a> though, they are coming out with tvs that don&#8217;t need glasses but are still 3d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

