Comments on: Canada’s thinnest TV?

By: Home AV

Home AV — Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:02:38 +0000

Cool post thats one thin TV

By: Mounting TV

Mounting TV — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:38:25 +0000

Great post!

By: Tv On Wall

Tv On Wall — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:04:36 +0000

Wonderful post! Thanks a lot.

By: AndyL

AndyL — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:44:07 +0000

Here is my 2 cents in response to the comment on the thickness of this Sharp TV.

One advantage of having a thinner TV is it increases the effective viewing distance and it matters a lot if you have a tight room with a short lengh. So 3mm or 6inch thickness can have a big impact if you have a tight room or you really would like to get a TV as reasonably big as possible.

By: BrettA

BrettA — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:38:39 +0000

Regarding projection… it can't touch where OLED is going – not for virtually anything relevant to the use. Projectors will be dinosaurs and for what it's worth, I submit that when you get "the largest", not too many people care about "the most portable" in the same breath. Keep these screens improving guys (i.e. science and the industry), and users might wanna analyze all the whiners, 'cause they're usually blowing smoke and not thinking long-term. Without the incremental changes we're seeing, we can't get to where we likely all want to go (even the complainers, who likely won't even realize it 'til we get there – LOL).

By: BrettA

BrettA — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:28:03 +0000

A few weird comments, methinks. It's not pointless at all… the thinner/lighter these get, ultimately the lower the price / the cheaper the transportation costs and the better for the environment. In 2002, BusinessWeek ran a story on (emerging) OLED technology and speculated that wall-sized screens would be available for not much more than paint within 15 years… I'd say we're not far off track given the improvement in size, longevity and cost over the past ~6 years. Samsung just showed a .5mm thick screen by the way. 6"? Pffft! And the "DVD, etc." will disappear with downloading – though the point's irrelevant anyway. Short-sighted, Steve.

By: Peter Pan

Peter Pan — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:26:55 +0000

Programing which is aimed at slightly above the complete idiot level is the problem. I can sleep through most programing and benefit more from the sleep than I ever could staying awake.

I own several TV's including a Sony LCD, a Hitachi projector and a couple old CRT's. The old 27" CRT probably has the best picture quality and is is about 20 years old.

I am waiting for 3D Holigraph quality.

By: linda venables

linda venables — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:50:17 +0000

I would love to see these thin TV's in my home. I think they are more practical than projecter models. Soon enough they will not need cables. I am sure they could work similarly to laptops with routers for signals. It could be like using devices from other rooms with a special signal sender..

By: Shaybawagwa

Shaybawagwa — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:43:03 +0000

I think this Tv is ultimately amazing
it i skinnier than my ipod
and thinner than my sister
this is amazing
where can i get one, i live in ahick town
how can you transport this to me
please tell me
lots of love from the hick folks down here
it is gonna revolutionaze the tv industry
peace yall

By: Dan

Dan — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:44:29 +0000

Lets see your projector in any well lit room...

Not to mention that you'll be changing your bulb every few thousand hours... which is approximately 1/20th of the life of a LCD / Plasma. :)

Don't get me wrong, projectors are great, but they're not for everybody and every situation.