<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right time to buy an HDTV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14234</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14234</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just wanted to say hello&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say hello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14233</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can find the prayer I want. I thank God for this website.t&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can find the prayer I want. I thank God for this website.t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lhuv</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14232</link>
		<dc:creator>lhuv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You have built a good website&lt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have built a good website&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14231</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14231</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is very interesting site&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B ig John Stud</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14230</link>
		<dc:creator>B ig John Stud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Vince,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look at consumer reports... What LCD&#039;s are given the highest rating? Sony XBR&#039;s. It&#039;s not Sony&#039;s marketing machine that makes the tv so popular, its the fact that they make a superior tv compared to their competitors. It&#039;s time to stop the Sony Hating.....&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince,</p>
<p>Look at consumer reports&#8230; What LCD&#39;s are given the highest rating? Sony XBR&#39;s. It&#39;s not Sony&#39;s marketing machine that makes the tv so popular, its the fact that they make a superior tv compared to their competitors. It&#39;s time to stop the Sony Hating&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Fish Poker Club</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14229</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Fish Poker Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you are a gamer, I suggest NOT going with the Sony LCD.  You will notice ghosting if playing fast games.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, if you are a sports fan...forget the LCD - it just doesn&#039;t cut it as compared to Plasma.  Unless you loved the Fox Tracker with the trail behind the puck, go plasma.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a gamer, I suggest NOT going with the Sony LCD.  You will notice ghosting if playing fast games.</p>
<p>Also, if you are a sports fan&#8230;forget the LCD &#8211; it just doesn&#39;t cut it as compared to Plasma.  Unless you loved the Fox Tracker with the trail behind the puck, go plasma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14228</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;All you Sony guys have been blinded by Sony&#039;s incredible &quot;marketing machine&quot;.  The Samsung 81 series is much better than the XBR 4/5.  You need see them side to side, and keep your damn Sony bias to the side.  First off, the Samsung 81 series has LED backlighting, that BLOWS away the Sony&#039;s contrast ratio; Samsung - 150,000:1 and Sony 18,000:1 !!!  And the colors are much more vivid.  AND the blacks of the Samsung are much deeper!!  Buy the Samsung 81 series bro!!!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you Sony guys have been blinded by Sony&#39;s incredible &quot;marketing machine&quot;.  The Samsung 81 series is much better than the XBR 4/5.  You need see them side to side, and keep your damn Sony bias to the side.  First off, the Samsung 81 series has LED backlighting, that BLOWS away the Sony&#39;s contrast ratio; Samsung &#8211; 150,000:1 and Sony 18,000:1 !!!  And the colors are much more vivid.  AND the blacks of the Samsung are much deeper!!  Buy the Samsung 81 series bro!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14227</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14227</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After thinking long and hard about all the arguments I&#039;m beginning to lean towards the Sony for a number of reasons. In all the reviews I&#039;ve read and watched on-line I don&#039;t think anyone has said they were unimpressed with the Sony XBR4. In fact everyone has pretty much agreed it is the Crown Jewel of 50+&quot; LCD TV&#039;s. Sure a few have said Plasma was superior. Some even feel the Pioneer Kuro Plasma&#039;s are also superior to the XBR4, but not by much in any case. When I also weigh in the factors that there is no threat of burn-in, consumes less power, views well in any room irregardless of lighting and cost about the same.....It&#039;s hard not pick the Sony. Not to mention the outer casing is far superior to the Panasonic.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking long and hard about all the arguments I&#39;m beginning to lean towards the Sony for a number of reasons. In all the reviews I&#39;ve read and watched on-line I don&#39;t think anyone has said they were unimpressed with the Sony XBR4. In fact everyone has pretty much agreed it is the Crown Jewel of 50+&quot; LCD TV&#39;s. Sure a few have said Plasma was superior. Some even feel the Pioneer Kuro Plasma&#39;s are also superior to the XBR4, but not by much in any case. When I also weigh in the factors that there is no threat of burn-in, consumes less power, views well in any room irregardless of lighting and cost about the same&#8230;..It&#39;s hard not pick the Sony. Not to mention the outer casing is far superior to the Panasonic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Navales</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14226</link>
		<dc:creator>A Navales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14226</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But remember what we are trying to compare... a 50&quot; Panasonic Plasma TH-50PZ700 and a Sony KDL-52XBR4. Simon, I believe you agree that the XBR4 is not your typical LCD TV.  I guess the only way to go is to do a head to head...&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But remember what we are trying to compare&#8230; a 50&quot; Panasonic Plasma TH-50PZ700 and a Sony KDL-52XBR4. Simon, I believe you agree that the XBR4 is not your typical LCD TV.  I guess the only way to go is to do a head to head&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html/comment-page-1#comment-14225</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sync.ymbn.net/sync/2008/01/right-time-to-b.html#comment-14225</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Panasonic Onyx XVS 42 inch. In fact, the only arguments against plasma that make any sense to me are the ones based on power-consumption. Plasmas still consume more power and that&#039;s a pity because IMHO, the picture is still superior to LCD. BTW, the one thing that really bugs me about LCD to this day is the off-angle viewing, especially on the vertical axis. Tilting an LCD has a noticeable effect on picture quality. Plasmas just don&#039;t suffer from this at all.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Panasonic Onyx XVS 42 inch. In fact, the only arguments against plasma that make any sense to me are the ones based on power-consumption. Plasmas still consume more power and that&#39;s a pity because IMHO, the picture is still superior to LCD. BTW, the one thing that really bugs me about LCD to this day is the off-angle viewing, especially on the vertical axis. Tilting an LCD has a noticeable effect on picture quality. Plasmas just don&#39;t suffer from this at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

